Um. no…A real man won’t not allow himself to get sucked into a system that takes advantage of his gender. A real man will not allow a woman to just up and leave with the children he helped create. Remember, the kids you created with that woman are yours too. A real man will fight until the death to rid himself of the shackles of a government racket designed to render him useless.
I refuse to pay child support and so should any man that desires a 50/50 stake in raising their children.
When both parents work and make a similar amount of money, and neither are at home raising the children, why is the burden on the father to pay child support? Yes, he may not live with the mother anymore, but why is there no mechanism for taking into account what expenses are actually spent on the children, and split the expenses accordingly? Is there any way for custodial mothers to be held accountable for violating court orders when fathers desire to see their children and are denied access? This is usually the case when custodial mothers do not receive their money on time, if ever. Why aren’t custodial parents held accountable for the way they DO spend child support?
I already know all the answers but I want whoever is reading this to start thinking about the concept of child support and what it really means. Does it means actually supporting children or supporting mothers?